Armour ID

Sword typology and Edge Weapons forms of the Chinese Empire and related cultures with an emphasis on their relationship to Swordsmanship.

Moderators:Scott M. Rodell, Philip Tom

Post Reply
David
Rank: Yang Chenfu
Rank: Yang Chenfu
Posts:32
Joined:Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:35 am
Armour ID

Post by David » Fri Dec 28, 2007 5:29 pm

There is a museum about an hour drive from me they have this suit of amour which they claim is Chinese is it and if so what dynasty is it from? I ask this because it looks identical to Japanese Amour without the Sode, Shikoro and a couple of other parts that could have easily fallen of in the past. The only thing the museum told me about it was how the Kelly gang where inspired by it to make their own amour. Was there a point in time like with swords where both China and Japan had similar if not identical amour?

Image

Scott M. Rodell
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts:1364
Joined:Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:50 pm
Location:Virginia
Contact:

Re: Armour ID

Post by Scott M. Rodell » Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:43 am

David wrote:... suit of amour which they claim is Chinese...
Well they got it wrong, it is Japanese...

David
Rank: Yang Chenfu
Rank: Yang Chenfu
Posts:32
Joined:Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:35 am

Post by David » Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:55 am

Thank You Scott I knew it was Japanese.
Funny how a museum who are suppost to know this sort of thing or at leat research their pieces don't know anything about it.

User avatar
Peter Dekker
Rank: Chang San feng
Rank: Chang San feng
Posts:395
Joined:Tue Dec 06, 2005 7:46 am
Location:Groningen, The Netherlands
Contact:

Post by Peter Dekker » Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:22 pm

Hi David,

I've been equally dissapointed in a number of museums I've visited around the world. Even Amsterdam's "Rijksmuseum" shows a "16th century Chinese weapon rack" that is full of Japanese weapons. There is not one word in the description about the many naginata, yumi bows, Japanese arrows and katana in the rack and not a single Chinese piece is present.

Another Dutch museum made some errors on their website about a painting depicting the Qianlong emperor and his men. I contacted them with a well backed up story on what they should have been and all I got was a "thank you for your information" while the errors are still there.

For Chinese museums, it is a total mess. Even the recently renovated arms section of the Forbidden City presents a Crimean Tatar bow as a Chinese bow. It also presents an otherwise beautiful saber as Qianlong's "Heaven Series Number One" while the 1759 regulations describe an entirely different "Heaven Series Number One", and there really is only one such saber. Pulling the saber out of the scabbard just a few inches should reveal the character tian (heaven) and serial number in gold but such a check might have been too much effort for the responsible curator.

According to the regulatons, next to the serial number "Heaven 1" has a wealth of gems in both suspension bar and guard while the presented example has none such gems and also no empty holes that would suggest that the gems were lost.

-Peter
Knowing is not enough, we must apply.
Willing is not enough, we must do.


-Bruce Lee

http://www.mandarinmansion.com
Antique Chinese Arms & Functional reproductions

http://www.manchuarchery.org
Fe Doro - Manchu Archery

Post Reply